With the special election in Alabama just a few days away, one of Roy Moore’s accusers just made a bombshell admission that could change the entire direction of it.
We previously reported that Young provided a yearbook as evidence that she and Moore had relations when she was younger. Within it is an inscription allegedly signed by Moore, but Internet sleuths quickly determined that there appeared to be two different types of writing, as seen in the photo below.
Beverly Young Nelson said Alabama GOP Senate candidate Roy Moore wrote a message in her yearbook in December 1977 that said, “To a sweeter more beautiful girl, I could not say, ‘Merry Christmas.'”
— CNN (@CNN) 13 November 2017
Well now, the truth has finally come out about the yearbook, and you may want to be sitting down for this one.
Beverly Young admitted to ABC News that the inscription was a forgery.
No, she really did.
Breitbart News has more:
Beverly Young Nelson, one of the women accusing GOP Senate candidate Roy Moore of sexual misconduct, tells @GMA it “sickens” her to think what might happen if Moore is elected. https://t.co/wuEGWr0kng pic.twitter.com/lcp5OY4x3A
— ABC News Politics (@ABCPolitics) 8 December 2017
“Nelson admits she did make notes to the inscription,” ABC News tells us. “But the message was all Roy Moore.”
“Beverly, he signed your yearbook,” ABC News reporter Tom Llamas says.
“He did sign it,” she replies.
“And you made some notes underneath.”
“Yes,” Nelson says.
And then, after a woman admits to forging a document used in a campaign to destroy the Republican nominee for the U.S. Senate in Alabama, ABC News quickly moves on as though it is not news of extraordinary consequence.
Wow. This is absolutely massive, folks.
First off, this woman just totally destroyed her own credibility by admitting that she forged the inscription in the yearbook. But secondly, and most importantly, what she did is a crime in Alabama punishable by prison time.
As I previously reported:
According to CriminalDefenseLawyer.com, Alabama law states the following about forged documents [emphasis mine]:
A person commits the crime of forgery in Alabama by making, completing, or altering a written instrument (or a written document, trademark, signature, or other symbol of value of identification) with the intent to defraud.
Making, completing, and altering. Forgery can be committed by creating, adding to, or altering a document. For example, signing another person’s signature to a contract can be forgery, as could deleting important paragraphs from a will, or creating a fake state identification card.
Intent to defraud. A person has an intent to defraud if he or she intends to deceive or trick. However, signing a love letter from a pop star to a friend as a joke is unlikely to result in criminal charges, because the intent is to amuse, not to deceive. But, signing the same pop star’s name to a poster with the intent to sell the poster on Ebay as an autograph is illegal, because the forger intends to trick whomever buys the poster into believing the autograph is real.
In other words, forging the yearbook signature with the intent to defraud the voters would be a felony offense in Alabama. Further, Allred wouldn’t be able to claim ignorance in the matter either.
More from the website:
It is not only a crime to create forged documents; it is also a crime to possess such documents. A person commits the offense of possession of forged instruments (documents) by having or uttering (asserting that a document is true) a forged document knowing that the document has been forged and with the intent to defraud.
Oh boy. It’s no wonder Allred refuses to turn over the yearbook; it’s a clear piece of evidence for her intent to defraud the voters in Alabama, as well as the rest of the nation.
Not only that, if it is proven she fraudulently used the yearbook to sway the votes of Alabama residents, she would also be guilty of election tampering, according to Section 17-17-38 of Alabama’s election law, which states:
Any person who, by bribery or offering to bribe, or by any other corrupt means, attempts to influence any elector in giving his or her vote, deter the elector from giving the same, or disturb or hinder the elector in the free exercise of the right of suffrage, at any election, shall be guilty, upon conviction, of a Class C misdemeanor.
I’m pretty sure that defrauding the voters would fall under that category.
This is major, and it’s totally going to change the outcome of the election.
Make sure you share the living hell out of this to show the country that the left really will resort to absolutely anything to win an election, including defaming the name of a good man using bogus sexual assault allegations.